
Male and Female: God's Genius!
by Patsy Rae Dawson
All linked Scripture is Courtesy Of
The Blue
Letter Bible.
The feminists flocked to the laboratories in the early
1970s to prove that no real differences exist between men and women. In
spite of their efforts, a tremendous amount of evidence surfaced to prove
God's genius in designing the male's and female's bodies and minds and
the way they work together.
Rights Notice
These electronically-transmitted pages are copyrighted
and belong to Samuel G. Dawson and Patsy Rae Dawson and are offered for
your personal use only. All rights are reserved. These pages may not be
copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, distributed
in any way, or incorporated in publications, databases, or software programs
without the express written permission of Samuel G. Dawson or Patsy Rae
Dawson, except in the form of brief excerpts or quotations for the purposes
of review. The information contained here is for your personal use and
you may print one copy and download one copy of the materials on any single
computer for your personal, non-commercial home use only, provided the
material is unmodified from the form supplied here and you keep intact
all copyright and other proprietary notices including headers and trailers
and their graphics along with URL and postal addresses. Modifying or making
copies of these pages or any portion for distribution or any purpose other
than your personal use is a violation of United States and international
copyright laws and proprietary rights. Many of the copyrights are registered
with the Library of Congress making violators subject to substantial monetary
penalties.
Copyright
Except where otherwise indicated, all scripture quotations
are taken from The New American Standard Bible, copyright The Lockman
Foundation © 1960, 1962, 1968, 1971. All rights reserved. Used by
permission.
Composed of excerpts from Marriage: A Taste of
Heaven, Vol. I: God's People Appreciate Marriage, by Patsy Rae Dawson,
© 1977, 1987, 1995 by Patsy Rae Dawson and Samuel G. Dawson. All rights
reserved. Used by permission of the publisher.
Copyright © 1996 by Patsy Rae Dawson and Samuel G. Dawson
ISBN 0-938855-47-6
Publisher:
Gospel Themes Press
2028 South
Austin, Suite 906 Amarillo, TX 79109-1960
All rights reserved. No part of this booklet may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, without written permission from the author,
except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review. If you need additional
copies, they can be purchased directly from Gospel
Themes Press.
Male and Female: God's Genius!
by Patsy Rae Dawson
With
the passing of the Equal Pay Act in 1963 and a feminist march in August,
1970, the equal rights movement began in earnest. The feminists promoted
not only equal pay for men and women, but also equal job opportunities.
The movement leaders claimed that any apparent differences between the
abilities of men and women resulted from conditioning in the homes and
schools. They denied that any inborn male-female differences existed at
all.
The next fifteen years saw
great reforms in employment laws that guaranteed women the right to pursue
any career they desired. Welcoming this new freedom, masses of women left
their homes and flocked to the marketplaces to take hold of new career
opportunities. However, statistics show that women still lag far behind
men in their climb up the corporate ladder.
A television special lamented
that modern men still resent women's abilities and that they continue to
deny women their lawful right to earn large paychecks. But does male hostility
really keep women on a lower pay scale than men? Can women really do anything
men can and better? Or are men and women really different after
all? When the facts are all in, is the man's masculinity really worthy
of respect?
During this same time, the
feminists invaded the laboratories to conduct intense studies on how the
environment shapes attitudes and abilities. Ironically, many researchers
admitted conducting biased experiments in hopes of dispelling the idea
that male-female differences really exist. More open-minded scientists
expressed fear of publishing their results because of the hostile reaction
of feminists. (David Gelman, "Just How the Sexes Differ," [Newsweek,
5/18/81], p. 72.) Other scientists simply gave up the research. One
scientist was denied a grant that would finance his study with the admonition,
"This work ought not to be done." (John Stossel, "Boys and Girls Are Different:
Men, Women and the Sex Difference," ABC News Special Transcript [Denver,
CO: Journal Graphics, 2/1/95], p. 5.) Still others refused to accept the
logical conclusions of their experiments with such hedges as, "We don't
know this"; "We have no evidence for that"; "Our experiments are inconclusive";
"Our knowledge is limited"; "We just don't know"; or "We have very conflicting
data on that point. We need more research." (George Gilder, Men and
Marriage [Gretna, LO: Pelican Publishing Co. Inc., 1986], p. 19.)
In spite of these drawbacks,
instead of finding proof of the hoped for similarities between men and
women, modern scientists discovered instead greater differences than ever.
Thus, a tremendous body of evidence has surfaced during the last twenty
years and continues to surface to prove beyond all doubt God's wisdom in
creating them male and female.
The Stronger and Weaker Vessels
I
Pet. 3:7: "You husbands likewise, live with your wives in an understanding
way, as with a weaker vessel, since she is a woman; and grant her honor
as a fellow-heir of the grace of life, so that your prayers may not be
hindered."
Through the guidance of the
Holy Spirit, Peter emphasized the inherent differences in men and women
in this verse. When compared to each other, the man, in the normal situation,
is stronger than the woman. Thus, a man must treat his wife as a feminine
being and not a masculine one.
Understanding the significance
of the word "vessel," which means "an implement," makes the male-female
relationship much clearer. God designed the male and female bodies as "tools"
which work together to serve Him. Just because the male tool is stronger
than the female tool doesn't make it superior.
For example, suppose some
men organize a work party to paint a building. They bring all kinds and
sizes of paint brushes. Some bring big six-inch thick brushes for slapping
the paint on the walls. Others bring small two-inch thin brushes for painting
the trim around the doors and windows.
When compared to the six-inch
brushes, the two-inch brushes are the weaker vessels or tools. However,
no superiority or inferiority exists between the two sizes of brushes.
If a man tries to paint a wall with a two-inch brush, it will wear him
out. He can do it, though. But his arm will get tired before he finishes
because the small brush will take three or four more brush strokes for
each of the larger brush's strokes to do the job. A two-inch brush is not
designed for painting walls.
On the other hand, suppose
that after a man finishes painting the walls with his big six-inch brush,
he decides to paint the trim. Instead of switching to a two-inch brush,
he says, "Well, I've already got this brush dirty, no point in messing
up another one." Then he goes ahead and paints the trim with his big brush,
and he gets the job done in a hurry. Yet everyone knows that he didn't
use the right size brush. They see where the enamel slopped over onto the
walls.
Brush manufacturers don't
design six-inch brushes to paint trim on a door or a windowthey're
too big to do a good job. But a two-inch brush paints trim very neatly.
At the same time, both brushes can substitute for the other when necessary.
However, they fail to perform with the same excellence as when they do
their own jobs.
That's the way with men and
women. God designed men to perform specific tasks. Obviously, men can replace
women in their roles at times. Even so, men lack the natural expertise
that women possess for nurturing their families. Likewise, while women
can carry out the men's jobs at times, they lack their special skillfulness
for earning a living. God designed both the male and the female tools for
different, but equally important, work.
Humans design their tools
for specific jobs the same way. Then when they use their tools, they choose
the one that will do the best job. Sometimes they substitute one tool for
another because they don't have the right one. But they recognize the problems
that making-do with the wrong tool often causes. That's what God did when
He created men and women. He designed the female tool for a certain job;
He designed the male tool for a different job. Absolutely no superiority
or inferiority existsjust different abilities and duties.
For this reason, God commands
the husband to honor his wife because of her weaknesses. In other words,
God wants a husband to deliberately assign great value to his wife because
of her weaknesses. The man's strength needs the woman's weaknesses and
vice versa just as the six-inch brush needs the two-inch brush to paint
a room.
Biologically Different
Scientists now recognize that
sex hormones play an important part in the way male and female fetuses
develop. At about six weeks in the male fetus, the Y chromosome causes
the testes to develop and to begin to produce the male hormone testosterone.
This hormone affects every part of the developing fetus from his brain
to his physical structure. But at about the twelfth week, the female fetus
begins producing the hormones estrogen and progesterone which create special
feminine characteristics. (Jane Barr Stump, Ph.D., What's the Difference?
How Men and Women Compare [New York: William Morrow & Co., Inc.,
1985], p. 79.)
Men, especially young men,
excel in pure brute strength. When men and women train equally, the woman
possesses only about two thirds of the overall strength of the man. Yet
the woman displays only about one third of the man's strength in her upper
body. The man's massive bones, larger joints, and longer arms and leg segments
all work together to give him greater leverage and power. The woman utilizes
about two thirds of the man's strength in her legs. Only a woman's stomach
muscles contain as much strength as a man's. (Stump, What's the Difference?
pp. 135 and 191.) The woman needs the strength in her stomach muscles during
childbirth.
Another source of a man's
strength comes from his large muscle mass which results from the action
of the hormone testosterone. During the man's adolescence testosterone
builds his muscles by adding bulk and fiber. Likewise, a man's muscle cells
increase in size until he turns forty. But a woman's muscle cells stop
growing by the time she is ten or eleven. Men possess about 50 percent
more muscles than women. (Stump, What's the Difference?> p. 134.)
In contrast, the female hormone
estrogen creates a greater fat storage in the woman, 27 percent to the
man's 15 percent, to make her soft and lovely in appearance. Weight and
height charts easily demonstrate this as men always weigh more than women
of the same height and bone structure. The extra fat in the female plus
her lack of comparative muscle fibers significantly lowers her physical
strength. The man exhibits greater physical strength than the woman simply
because his body contains more lean muscles with which to lift objects
and work.
While a man develops powerful
muscles without effort on his part, a woman develops strength in her muscles
only through vigorous exercise to overcome the action of her hormones.
Even then she only achieves 60 to 70 percent of the strength of a man.
(Stump, What's the Difference? pp. 134-135.) Thus, a man who never
exercises, but simply lies on the divan all day watching television, still
has more brute strength than a woman who exercises to her maximum limit.
To do better, a woman must take anabolic steroidsartificial male
hormones to stimulate muscle growth. Then she risks considerable health
problems. (Eric Gelman, "In Sports, 'Lions Vs. Tigers,' " [Newsweek,
5/18/8], p. 75.)
A man's larger lungs also
affect his physical strength by supplying him with about two quarts more
air than a woman's do. He also has a larger heart and 20 percent more red
blood cells to transport the oxygen to his cells. This gives a man more
quick energy than a woman normally utilizes and explains why a woman is
more prone to faint. Of course, when a man fails to exercise his body and
lungs properly, he may get out of breath quicker than a woman who maintains
excellent physical condition. However, in the normal situation a man enjoys
a greater capacity for doing strenuous work than a woman. (Stump, What's
the Difference? pp. 35, 72, 120.) God simply designed a man's body
for more strenuous work than He designed a woman's body for.
Through the influence of
the modern feminist movement, the workplace has conducted social experiments
that also show the great differences in the physical strength of men and
women. For example, John Stossel in an ABC news special titled "Boys and
Girls Are Different: Men, Women and the Sex Difference" told what happened
after the courts started forcing the hiring of women firefighters:
Firefighters need
to be strong. On the strength test given applicants, women just don't do
as well as men. That doesn't matter, said a judge in San Francisco, the
department must do what the bureaucrats call a reach-down. Instead of simply
hiring applicants who do best on the qualification tests, you reach down
to women who score lower. . . . The department wants firefighters
to be able to climb over a wall. This requires upper body strength many
women just don't have. Likewise, firefighters need to be able to use an
axe to chop through a door. They train on logs. The men can split them,
but the women often cannot. Some of the women who can, don't want to work
with these women. (Stossel, "Boys and Girls Are Different," pp. 6-7.)
Then Stossel interviewed Kate
O'Beirne, a member of the conservative Heritage Foundation about the firefighters:
How is America better
off if the real physical demands of a job have to be watered down to accommodate
women? If I, as an all-suffering taxpayer, have to be evacuated from a
building, I used to be carried by a male firefighter. I am now dragged
by my ankles, as my head hits every single stair going down three stories.
I prefer being carried. I assume most taxpayers prefer being carried. (Stossel,
"Boys and Girls Are Different," p. 7.)
Next Stossel gave Gloria Steinem
and Bella Abzug, founding mothers of the modern feminist movement, a chance
to reply:
Gloria Steinem:
It's better to drag them out, because there's less smoke down there. I
mean, we're probably killing people by carrying them out at that height,
you know, soI mean, you know, we need to look sensibly here at
these jobs and what they really require, and not just some idea of what
macho is.
- John Stossel: The
men in the fire department say the women aren't strong enough.
- Bella Abzug: That's
true.
- John Stossel: They've
had to change the test.
- Bella Abzug: Well,
that's all right. Institutions have to adjust. If there are still physical
problems which prevent certain activities, those activities should be assisted,
so that itin a way, with technology, so that it's possible.
- John Stossel: They
should give them an electric axe?
- Bella Abzug: Whatever
is required. (Stossel, "Boys and Girls Are Different," p. 7.)
Even if dragging people from
burning building was safer smoke wise and brain-injury wise from bouncing
on the steps than carrying people out, Gloria Steinem fails to observe
that men can do either one. Men can either drag the person out or carry
the person down a fire truck ladder. Normal women don't have both choices
as do men.
Likewise, Bella Abzug's remark
that giving the women electric axes is not a bad idea if that is what is
required for a woman to be able to break down a door misses the point.
Men can use either an electric axe or an ordinary axe. The normal woman
doesn't get to choose what kind of axe if she wants to rescue someone from
a burning building. She has to use an electric axe that maybe some male
firefighter carried in for her. When facing horrifying death or disfiguring
burn scars, Kate O'Beirne's observation that the tax-playing public would
prefer to be rescued by whoever could get them out of danger the quickest
is, no doubt, accurate.
The feminists, who try to
deny the differences between men and women, should pay attention to John
Stossel's concluding remarks in his TV special, especially when he started
his program by stating that he was biased in support of the feminist movement:
So why not celebrate
them [the differences between men and womenPRD], rather than
deny that they exist? Why not let people's natural inclinations take them
wherever their potential allows? Furthermore, if we deny what science knows
about human nature, how can we create sensible social policies? Isn't it
better to act on the basis of what is true, rather than maintaining it
has no right to be true? . . . I think the main point is that
men and women may be created equal, but we're not the same. (Stossel, "Boys
and Girls Are Different," p. 9.)
While John Stossel fails to
give God the credit for the differences in the man's and the woman's strength,
the design of the woman's body shows the efficiency of God's creation.
For instance, many animals possess unique characteristics that help them
adapt to their specific environments. The polar bear benefits from built-in
sunglasses that other bears don't have or need. A duck's feathers contain
natural waterproofing that other birds wouldn't use because they don't
swim.
In a similar manner, the
man's muscles and fast metabolism would be just as wasted on a woman as
sunglasses would be on a grizzly bear and waterproofing would be on a chicken.
For example, taking care of children and the home rarely requires the same
strength and energy from a woman that plowing a field or doing construction
work demands of a man. Powerful, gripping muscles don't help a woman teach
and love her children, wash dishes, run the vacuum cleaner, or make the
beds.
That God also considers the
environment and specific jobs in His design of humans is easily seen in
some of the differences between the races. For example, peoples native
to the equator, the closest point to the sun, have the darkest skin of
all races. Their skin color protects them from sunburn which leads to various
skin cancers. The farther one travels from the equator, the lighter the
skin becomes until one finds very pale skin and hair coloring. The fair
skin found in the Northern climates is not for looks. Rather than blocking
the sun as the darker skins do, fair skin enables these people to better
absorb the beneficial rays of the sun that provide vitamin D for making
strong bones. Thus, through skin color, God provides an ingenious way for
the people of the earth to get exactly the right amount of sun absorption
for good health. However, due to travel and immigration, men and women
must now often use artificial means to either protect their skin from skin
cancers or to get enough vitamin D.
Indeed, the differences between
the races probably reflect God's love and concern for mankind by adapting
them specifically for their various native environments. However, man's
limited understanding of his own body and environment may prevent him from
fully appreciating God's wisdom. The Eskimos serve as an excellent example
of God's wisdom:
Eskimos live in
the arctic regions where temperatures rarely go above freezing. Because
they are short, average 5'2", they lose little body heat. They burn food
rapidly, which regulates body temperature, and blood vessels are arranged
so that more blood flows to exposed parts such as hands and face. Thus,
Eskimos work in subzero temperatures with bare hands without any complications.
(Philip Seff, "Our Fascinating Earth: Why Eskimos Survive," [OFE, 1988].)
Not only do racial differences
reflect God's wisdom and love, but the differences between the sexes also
show God's care. A woman's work involves industryall the strength
and energy of a womanbut not the robust output of a man. God
gave the woman what she needs to successfully accomplish her work, not
the man's. In fact, the woman's weaknesses bless both the man and woman:
Song
of Sol. 2:14: "O my dove, in the clefts of the rock, in the secret
place of the steep pathway, let me see your form, let me hear your voice;
for your voice is sweet, and your form is lovely."
The Shepherd longed to be near
the Shulammite maiden, whom he considered his "dove"a continual
source of peace and comfort to him. He wanted to see her lovely form, for
God designed a woman's body, not to do a man's work, but to comfort the
man after a day of hard labor.
A woman's voice sounds differently
from a man's because her smaller larynx and shorter vocal cords give her
a higher pitch. Her range of five tones to the man's three also produces
a softer voice. (Stump, What's the Difference? p. 214.) In addition,
she enjoys a way with words that few men rival. From the moment of birth,
while baby boys ignore voices to busily observe novel objects and their
surroundings, baby girls respond less to objects and more to what they
hear. And so it will be for the rest of their lives. (Annie Gottlieb, "Men
and Women: What Differences Do the Differences Really Make?" [Mademoiselle,
7/81], p. 80.)
Researchers think this excellent
verbal ability is connected to the woman's "superior tactile sensitivity."
For the most part, a woman's physical senses, such as touch, taste, and
hearing are more sensitive than a man's. Bright lights, repetitious sounds,
and loud noises often found in earning a living and freeway driving distress
women more quickly than men. Yet these sensitivities translate into the
feminine "affinity for precision and detail." As a result, women usually
make better typists, bookkeepers, needle workers, and neurosurgeons than
men. This devotion to detail helps girls talk faster than boys, carry a
better tune, and remember conversations longer than men. On the other hand,
boys are more likely to stutter, spell worse, and suffer more learning
disabilities. (Gelman, "Just How the Sexes Differ," p. 73.)
A woman uses her voice tones
and verbal specialties as either a blessing or a weapon. For example, a
woman's soft, sweet voice soothes her husband into rest when he needs it
the most; cheers him up when he suffers discouragement; and expresses soft,
tender affectionate love when he feels alone. On the other hand, many a
man suffers a nervous breakdown because the tension at home compounds the
frustrations at work. A wife who acts like a hawk instead of a dove can
easily destroy a man, even a strong man.
While biologically weaker,
a woman possesses all the strength she needs to do her work. Plus, she
enjoys a body which provides physical pleasure for both her husband and
herself. Thus, her weaknesses become an even greater strength in lovemaking:
Prov.
5:18-19: "Let your fountain be blessed, and rejoice in the wife of
your youth. As a loving hind and a graceful doe, let her breasts satisfy
you at all times; be exhilarated always with her love."
The expression "wife of your
youth" refers to an older husband who still lives with the bride he married
in his youth. They have grown old together. This chapter of Proverbs deals
with the special charms an older wife holds for her husband as she becomes
an exciting lover.
Solomon listed several qualities
that a godly wife uses to keep her husband's interest throughout the years.
Just as softness combined with free, spontaneous love causes men to cherish
affectionate animals, these same qualities enhance a wife's appeal. God
personally designed the soft and delightful nature of a woman's body to
captivate her husband. That extra ten percent fat doesn't help open pickle
jars, but it certainly satisfies a husband's physical needs. Then as a
wife gives herself freely in love to her husband, her skin texture and
form become beautiful to him.
A woman's thin skin also
contributes to her soft and fragile nature. On the average, a woman's skin
is 20 to 25 percent thinner than the man's. ("Women More Thin-Skinned,"
Spokane Daily Chronicle, 11/20/75].)
Just as God designed the
woman's skin to help her express love to her husband, the man's skin comes
equipped with special features to help him work in all kinds of weather.
For instance, when allowed to grow, whiskers protect a man's face from
mosquitoes in warm climates and from ice and snow in cold ones Also, a
man's thicker skin withstands the rays of the sun and the harshness of
the wind better than a woman's which helps him provide for his family year-round.
In His wisdom and love, God
designed both the man and the woman with unique physical characteristics
to enable them to expertly perform their individual jobs. In like manner,
the man's emotional nature differs from the woman's to help them master
the important jobs awaiting them:
Psychologically Different
Thanks to medical breakthroughs
and the catalyst of feminists disputing that any mental differences exist
between men and women, scientists understand the functions of the brain
better than ever before. While many questions still lack answers, modern
research continually unmasks previously unknown wonders of the male and
female brains. David Gelman's excellent article, "Just How the Sexes Differ,"
discusses some of the findings. He explains how the sex hormones hold the
"key to the difference" by "masculinizing" or "femininizing" fetal brains
in the womb. These hormones affect the way the male and the female brains
develop which greatly influences their mental abilities and temperaments.
(Gelman, "Just How the Sexes Differ," p. 83.)
For example, the two sides
of the male's brain work independently of each other instead of together
as the woman's brain does. This gives the man an edge over the woman in
mathematics, especially higher mathematics such as geometry and trigonometry.
This also provides the male with visual-spatial abilities that women often
lack. Thus, many mechanical tasks prove much easier for men than women
because of their greater perception of space and depth. (Stump, What's
the Difference? pp 38, 127-128.)
Likewise, the man's specialized
brain helps him home in on the root of problems once he has all the facts
and to solve them better than women generally can. (Gelman, "Just How the
Sexes Differ," p. 81.) This gives the man the potential of becoming an
excellent leader at work, in the home, and in the church when he develops
this skill.
Furthermore, the design of
the man's brain helps him concentrate on two thinking projects at the same
time such as running a computer program while watching the news. (Daniel
Goleman, "Special Abilities of the Sexes: Do They Begin in the Brain?"
[Psychology Today, 11/78], p. 54.) This ability makes the man more
suited than the woman for worrying about problems. He can worry and fulfill
his obligations at the same time. While many women exhibit financial resourcefulness,
personal problems can so occupy their thinking that it incapacitates them
and prevents them from successfully doing their work.
While no measurable difference
in intelligence exists between men and women, a woman's brain works much
differently than the man's. The two halves of her brain are more closely
connected and work together. Also, a woman possesses a larger corpus
calosum, or bridge between the two brain halves, than a man. Scientists
theorize that this gives the woman "more room for neural pathways" and
better inner brain communication. (Stump, What's the Difference? pp.
54-55.)
This ability to transmit
information back and forth more rapidly than the man produces the female
intuitionthe woman's ability to interpret facial expressions,
bodily movements, voice tone, etc. Rather than being specialized like the
man's brain, the two sides of the woman's brain work together on problems.
This generalized way of looking at things makes the woman more perceptive
to her emotional environment than the man is. (Stump, What's the Difference?
pp. 106-107.)
Scientists first discovered
these differences in the male and the female brains when they studied stroke
patients. A woman who suffers a stroke can usually train the undamaged
side of her brain to take over for the damaged half. Unfortunately, when
a man suffers a stroke, the damage is more permanent since the two sides
of his brain work independently of each other. (Stump, What's the Difference?
p. 38.)
Due to advancing technology,
these brain differences were actually seen by Dr. Sally Shaywitz, a behavioral
scientist at the Yale University School of Medicine, along with her husband
Bennett, a neurologist and colleague. Through a state-of-the-art form of
magnetic resonance image (MRI) scan that showed brain-activity patterns,
they tested nineteen men and nineteen women while they performed various
mental tasks. The scans provided "definitive evidence" that men and women
use their brains differently when thinking and coming up with the same
answers. While many social scientists attempt to explain away the differences
between men and women by attributing them to some phase in their theory
of evolution, these doctors could not:
Dr. Shaywitz said
she was particularly surprised to see differences between men and women
in decoding words. Reading, she said, has nothing to do with basic survival
skills or reproduction, for which men and women might have developed different
brain functions during the long course of evolution. "This is a difference
that involves cognition," she said. "And it is the most complex of human
functions. Reading is the pinnacle of what humans can do." (Gina Kolata,
"Brain Reveals the Difference Gender Makes," [>The News Tribune 2/16/95],
p. A1.)
In addition, women excel in
analogies. (Stump, What's the Difference? p. 22.) This involves
a woman's skill for drawing logical inferences based on the assumption
that if two things are known to be alike in some respects, then they must
also be alike in other respects. For example, a woman might observe her
child do something that causes her great concern because of her ability
to compare it with his earlier actions or even someone else's child. She
recognizes a pattern of conduct as it begins to develop before it actually
becomes entrenched. This enables her to tell her husband, "I'm worried
about our son. He's done . . . which reminds me of what he
did last summer. I'm afraid it will lead to . . . ." Giving
the husband this information helps him make a wise decision about what
to do. In this way, her keen perception combines with the husband's excellent
solution-finding abilities to protect the children.
However, a woman's analogy-drawing
abilities can get her into trouble. If she remembers everything her husband
ever did wrong and never gives him the right to make mistakes and learn
from them, then she usually views their problems as being much worse than
they really are. Heeding God's regulations of forgiving and forgetting
along with not judging motives prevents a woman from abusing her mental
gift from God. A woman's intuition is not a righteous substitute for the
principles of wisdom found in the Bible.
Likewise, a woman's single-mindedness
serves as either a weakness or as an advantage in her role in the home.
For example, while many a wife accuses her husband of not caring, the way
her brain works helps her recognize problems long before her husband
does. The man's ability to concentrate on two things at once enables
him to work to earn a living in spite of the emotional atmosphere of the
home. This is an asset for him.
Just the opposite, the woman's
brain combines her quick perception of problems with a single-mindedness
which refuses to allow her to forget them. So as a woman tries to read
stories to he children or work as a secretary, her problems greatly affect
her performance. Her preoccupation with her problems brings on irritableness
or depression which drives her to find a solution. If she seeks
solutions after God's wisdom, her single-mindedness becomes a blessing
which benefits her husband and children. She soon becomes an expert and
valued problem-solver who keeps a warm, happy emotional tone in her home.
This brings out the best in her husband and children.
Many a man hungers for love
and acceptance as much as his wife does, but he lacks the inborn know-how,
the intuition, and the emotional depth that a woman possesses. When properly
used, a wife's emotional makeup helps her apply God's instructions to the
saving of her marriage. Many an unhappy husband desperately awaits a gracious
woman to come along as the answer to his problem of loneliness. When such
a woman accepts the challenge of filling her home with love and understanding,
the grateful husband usually responds gladly.
The man's sex hormones also
affect his temperament by promoting aggression. Women, on the other hand,
must learn aggressive behavior. Little boys demonstrate this aggression
in their rough and tumble play and competition with other boys. Most violent
crimes are committed by young men at an age when their testosterone levels
are the highest. While women speak with familiarity when seated next to
each other, men display aggression when sitting close to other men with
wise-cracking, fun-poking, etc. (Stump, What's the Difference? pp,
15-16, 152.)
In 1995 neuropsychologist
Ruben Gur actually saw brain differences in the way men and women deal
with emotions:
The emotions that
trigger a man to fight while a woman reacts with words, facial expressions
and gestures are not merely learned behavior but have a physical basis
as well, university researchers say.
"We have known that
men and women behave differently in all sorts of ways and one of the differences
most striking is in the way men and women deal with emotions," Ruben Gur,
director of the brain behavior laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania,
said in an interview. . . .
Sophisticated scanning
techniques showed the part controlling action-oriented responses was more
active in men. The part of the brain thought to control more-symbolic emotional
responses was more active in women, the scientists write in today's issue
of the journal Science. . . .
"The speculation
is that the reason men are more inclined to express aggression instrumentally
is because this is a part of the brain that is more active in men," he
said. "Conversely, the part of the brain more active in women deals with
more refined, symbolic means of emotional expression." (Harry F. Rosenthal,
"Men Have Fighting on the Brain," [The News Tribune, 1/27/95], p.
A3.)
A newspaper article said that
the Russians discovered that if they sent a woman into space with a man,
the cosmonauts endured the flight with much less stress than when they
sent only men. The woman's more passive emotional makeup counteracted the
man's more aggressive nature. The article added that NASA observed the
same calming effect of women on their flights and also prefers to send
mixed crews of astronauts. Obviously, it is not good for man to be alone,
even in outer space!
While valuable in the close
quarters of a space capsule, this lack of natural aggression inherent within
women probably contributes to the small number of women succeeding as corporation
heads. Sylvia Porter reported in 1982 that women made up only six percent
of the corporate managers in the United States. (Sylvia Porter, "You and
Your Money: The Truth About Equal Pay," [Ladies' Home Journal, 8/82],
p. 22.) The televised ABC News report "After the Sexual Revolution" stated
that fewer women served as corporate executives in 1985 than in 1982. The
program asserted that "male hostility and suspicion" created the problem.
(Peter Jennings, "After the Sexual Revolution," ABC News Closeup Transcript
[New York: Journal Graphics, 9/1/86], p. 5.)
On the contrary, rather than
men denying women their constitutional right to succeed in the commercial
world, the women's own lack of a driving aggressive nature holds many women
back from competing effectively. Even when women work their way up through
numerous promotions, their different mental outlooks continue to affect
their work performance.
For example, women generally
make more sacrifices with their families for their jobs and appear more
career-oriented than most men. Yet women commonly negate this work advantage
by failing to efficiently utilize their authority and by bringing a nurturing
quality to the office. They make themselves more accessible to other employees
by leaving their office doors open twice as much as men. They walk among
their employees to make sure everything is okay and encourage interruptions
both on the job and at home. In contrast, men more often expect their employees
to work on their own, and they depend upon their secretaries to protect
them from interruptions on unimportant matters. Essentially, men conduct
themselves in a more independent and businesslike manner than women generally
do. (Stump, What's the Difference? pp. 12, 116, and 123.)
Consequently, if women want
to compete more equally with men for higher-level corporate jobs, they
might do well to take testosterone to increase their level of aggressiveness.
At the same time, however, they should prepare to shave their faces daily,
have their voices change as they develop an Adam's apple, and try to avoid
flexing their new muscles. A better solution might be to accept the differences
between men and women along with the different roles God created for them
to occupy:
The Man's Role
When a man takes a wife, he
assumes many God-given responsibilities that take advantage of his differing
physical and mental capabilities. Paul outlined the husband's primary obligations
toward his wife in Eph.
5:23-33 and showed that God wants the man to pattern himself after
Christ:
Leads His Family
Eph.
5:23-24: "For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is
the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body. But as
the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives ought to be to their
husbands in everything."
The husband is the head of the
wife as Christ also is the head of the church. As Christ considers the
needs of the church and guides her wisely, a husband has the responsibility
of leading his wife in all matters. God not only placed a big responsibility
on the man's shoulders, but He expects him to perform it to the best of
his ability.
Many a wife, who spends hours
trying to persuade her husband to her way of thinking, fails to realize
that God made her husband think differently from her to help him be a better
leader. Being able to leave his emotions out enables a man to make wise
decisions as he leads, protects, and provides for his family.
Likewise, the ability to
disregard his emotions equips a man to better love his wife and to act
in her best interest. For instance, after intense emotions die down, many
problems take on completely different perspectives. While emotions require
consideration, the wisest decision possible demands that the leader act
according to the facts rather than his feelings.
God also gives the man the
job of guiding his children wisely:
Eph.
6:4: "And, fathers, do not provoke your children to anger; but bring
them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord."
Good News for Modern Man,
a paraphrase or one-man's opinion of the scriptures, says, "And parents
[emphasis minePRD] do not provoke your children to anger." However,
God did not make a mistake and leave mothers out of this passage. While
God designed an important role for mothers, this passage addresses the
father's responsibility.
God gives fathers the special
job of overseeing the complete education of their children. Even though
many people consider this the woman's job, God places the primary responsibility
on the man's shoulders. The woman helps the man in this area, but God gives
the position of leadership in training the children to the man.
The man's leadership involves
"discipline." God wants fathers to oversee every bit of their children's
training in the home, the public school system, and in the Bible classes.
This doesn't mean the father teaches everything himself. It means he stays
abreast of the child's development and makes sure his needs are supplied.
"Instruction" makes up an important part of the father's responsibilities.
He gives his children verbal instruction to admonish them and to warn them
about the dangers of life. Obviously, God gives the man a tremendous responsibility
to lead his wife and children. Yet God expects more of him:
Protects His Family
Eph.
5:23: "For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head
of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body."
While the word "savior" carries
religious connotations to modern people, it didn't to the Jews. They viewed
their kings and leaders as saviorsmen who protected them from
financial, political, and physical harm.
Christ, the ultimate Savior,
protects His followers from their sins and from physical and mental harm
through obedience to His word. The husband portrays this same image of
a deliverer and preserver on a lesser scale in the family realm as he protects
his wife from mental and bodily harm. A husband cannot save his wife from
her sins as Christ does, but he can foresee hazardous situations and avoid
them. When necessary, he physically defends his wife. This job demands
that a man stay constantly alert for hidden dangers, both physical and
mental.
Several hundred years ago,
a man more easily recognized his enemies. If a bear growled outside, the
man knew he needed to get his gun and shoot him. If his children screamed,
"There's a snake in the woodpile!" the man knew what to do. In addition,
the man spent the summer preparing for the winter gathering wood and storing
food.
Now many single women and
mothers claim that a man in the house hinders their lives. Since few bears
and snakes roam the earth terrorizing women and children, and since equal
pay along with many social benefits and welfare programs help families
in need, they advocate phasing out the man as leader and protector. "Who
really needs a husband?" they ask.
What a disastrous attitude
for society! Women need a strong man more than ever because modern dangers
are cleverly camouflaged. Often people fail to recognize them until after
the harm is done to innocent minds and bodies. In many ways, it would be
easier for a man to fight bears than drug pushers, or to kill snakes than
to refute the teachings of evolution in the public schools. A man could
easily see if he had chopped enough wood to get his family through the
winter, but does he foresee how sexual immorality on television warps and
destroys his children?
Wives still need protection,
too. Modern society makes it easy for a woman to over-extend herself so
that she harms both her health and her emotional reserve. God expects a
husband to lookout for his wife's best interest and to help her say, "No,"
to the children, the neighbors, the school, and even sometimes to jobs
within the church.
Provides for His Family
Eph.
5:28-30: "So husbands ought also to love their own wives as their own
bodies. He who loves his own wife loves himself; for no one ever hated
his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ also does
the church, because we are members of His body."
As Christ nourished and cherished
the church, God holds the husband accountable for providing his wife with
food, clothing, and shelter. In so doing, the husband must follow the standard
of the "nourishment" he provides for his own body. If he feels cold, he
turns up the heat or he buys himself a new jacket or he eats some food
to warm his body internally.
In this day of easy welfare
and a lack of shame for lazy and unproductive men, a good provider and
manager of the budget is rarer than ever. Especially since many men, who
work steadily, waste their incomes before they furnish the necessities
of life.
Today men exercise less control
over their ability to work than the average man did a hundred years ago
when the majority of men worked in a family-owned business or on the family
farm. Now many jobs are boring busy-work and don't require much imagination.
Frequently, men must work for someone who doesn't fully appreciate their
efforts which gives them little motivation to excel. Thus, too many times
all a man receives for eight hours a day, five days a week, is a paycheck
that is soon spent. Yet a man's aggressive temperament and ability to leave
his emotions out enable him to keep working after the glamour disappears.
Providing for a family is
not equal to turning a paycheck over to a wife for her to worry about stretching
it to meet all the bills. When a man provides for his family, he makes
sure his income covers all their necessities. Whether he writes the
checks or she does isn't important. What matters is that the husband knows
the financial condition of the family and controls it. The man's financial
obligations also extend to his children as the verses about the elders
and deacons demonstrate (I
Tim. 3:4-5, 12).
The Bible nowhere tells a
man that he must provide a high standard of living for his family, but
it cautions everyone not to place their hopes in physical luxuries. As
part of his leadership over his family, the man determines what their standard
of living should be and maintains it.
Most husbands, even non-Christians,
want to lead, protect, and provide for their families. Yet God wants every
husband to balance these natural desires with a genuine love and concern
for his wife. Loving his wife as himself serves as a safety regulation
to prevent the man from misusing his authority:
The Guardian of Authority
"Guardian" means "one who guards,
keeps safe, or secures, a custodian" (Webster).
As a husband goes about subduing
the earth and filling it with people, God gives him the responsibility
of guarding authority. A husband exercises this duty as he leads, protects,
and provides for his wife and children through love. While God designed
the husband as the custodian of authority, the wife serves as his helper.
Her efforts aid in preserving authority as she works alongside her husband
and shows respect for his leadership.
I
Cor. 11:7: "For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he
is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man."
God didn't make a mistake when
He inspired Paul to say, "Man is the image and glory of God, but the woman
is the glory of man." Certainly, God created the woman in His image along
with the man in the garden of Eden; and she needs to reflect that image
in her honesty, devotion, unfeigned love, genuine sorrow for the afflictions
of others, humility, trust, purity, and intelligent reasoning abilities.
However, God created the husband in His image in one area where the wife
is not in His imagein the area of authority in the home. A parallel
passage shows how the husband derives this likeness in authority from God:
Eph.
5:23: "For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the
head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body."
This scripture reveals a special
job that the husband doesn't share with his wifepatterning his
leadership after Christ so that he reflects the image and glory of God
in the realm of family authority. Thus, God not only gave the husband a
position of authority which He never intended for the wife to occupy, God
also provided an example for the husband to follow in exercising his authority.
When a husband fulfills his God-given position of leadership by following
Christ's example, he glorifies God who created him differently from a woman
(Eph. 5:28-29).
A leadership position contains
no room for selfishness. It demands that considerate love control every
decision and action of the one in charge. This type of love promotes trusteven
when opinions differ. But when selfishness reigns, the home often deteriorates
into a jungle where every man, woman, and child fight for their own rights
with the strongest one winning. A husband, who disregards his wife's welfare,
is not a guardian of authority even if he shouts loudly, "I'm the boss
and what I say goes!" Such a husband shames God's image rather than glorifying
it.
Feminists complain bitterly
about selfishness on the part of husbands. But their solution of removing
the man from the head of the family only makes matters worse. Even with
the better educated and self-sufficient women of today, the man is still
the best inherently qualified one to serve as the leader. Obviously, the
solution is to remove the selfishness, not the man.
Before any marriage becomes
a taste of heaven and reaps the blessings of God, mutual respect for the
role of each marriage partner must exist. The husband must respect both
his own role and his wife's. The wife, likewise, must show respect for
her husband's position and her relationship to him. Where no respect presides
for the spouse or the divine office that the mate holds, pure love fails
to thrive.
The husband not only serves
as the guardian of authority for his wife, but also serves as the guardian
of authority for his children:
Heb.
12:7-9: "It is for discipline that you endure; God deals with you as
with sons; for what son is there whom his father does not discipline? But
if you are without discipline, of which all have become partakers, then
you are illegitimate children and not sons. Furthermore, we had earthly
fathers to discipline us, and we respected them; shall we not much rather
be subject to the Father of spirits, and live?"
As a father, a man should portray
the image of God, the Father. Thus, a father who doesn't back-up his word
teaches his children disrespect for what God says. God created the father
as the stronger vessel, both biologically and psychologically, so he could
be a wise guardian of authority as he leads, provides for, and protects
his children.
The Woman's Role
Tit.
2:4-5: " . . . that they may encourage the young women to love their
husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home,
kind, being subject to their own husbands, that the word of God may not
be dishonored."
This passage summarizes a woman's
responsibilities toward God, her husband, her children, herself, and others.
This booklet just notices the overall quality of her dutiesher
love:
Loves Her Husband
"Love" comes from the Greek
word phileo attached to the word for husband and means "1. to love,
to be friendly to one, to love, i.e., delight in, long for; 2. to kiss."
(Joseph Henry Thayer, Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
[Grand Rapids, MI: Associated Publishers and Authors Inc., n.d.], p. 3.)
Wigram's lexicon defines this word as meaning "to manifest some act or
token of kindness or affection, to kiss, to love, regard with affection,
have affection for, to like, be fond of, delight in a thing, to cherish
inordinately, set store by." (Wigram, Analytical Greek Lexicon of the
New Testament [Wilmington, DL: Associates Publishers and Authors Inc.,
n.d.], p. 426.)
The love (phileo)
that God wants a wife to learn to feel for her husband and children differs
from the love (agape) that God commands a husband to manifest toward
his wife in Eph.
5:22-33. Thayer describes the differences between phileo and
agape:
As to the distinction
between agapan and philein: the former, by virtue of its
connection with agamai, properly denotes a love founded in admiration,
veneration, esteem, like the Lt. diligere, to be kindly disposed
to one, wish one well; but philein denotes an inclination prompted
by sense and emotion. (Thayer, Greek-English Lexicon, p. 653.)
Phileo expresses an affectionate,
emotional, and physical love that is manifest by patting, hugging, squeezing,
and kissing the loved one. Matt.
26:48 demonstrates this by using a form of phileo for the word
"kiss" when Judas betrayed Jesus. On the other hand, agape results
from love based primarily on an intellectual estimation of the needs of
the loved one.
Peter gives an example of
the differences between phileo and agape by using them together
in I Pet.
1:22: "Since you have in obedience to the truth purified your souls
for a sincere love of the brethren, [philadelphiancombination
of phileo and brother] fervently love [agapesateform
of agape] one another from the heart." Again, Peter uses these two
root words together in I
Pet. 5:14: "Greet one another with a kiss [philematiform
of phileo] of love [agape]."
The Jews had a tradition
that demonstrates the affection of phileo. They considered weaving
a woman's work, and unmanly for a man. They looked down on an unskilled
man who could only weave for a living. However, if the man's wife proudly
sat on the rooftop with him in the cool of the evening and visited with
the neighbors as they passed by, then the Jews said the man married a wonderful
wife who really loved him.
Phileo includes this
type of admiring love. Regardless of what the husband does for a living,
a wife's true emotional attachment to him makes her beam with pride. She
considers him to be the greatest husband she could ever want. This kind
of love comes easily during courtship. When a young girl dates a boy, onlookers
often ask, "What does she see in him? How can she care anything about him?"
These skeptics recognize that courting love is blind. In addition, men
and women seldom marry without this type of love. Men seek it in their
wives, and women insist on feeling it for their husbands.
Unfortunately, this type
of love often disappears after marriage as a husband and a wife begin to
notice irritating habits in the other. Then love often gives way to bitterness
in the hearts of both. Married love isn't so blind. Observing that many
a man marries a woman who truly admired him during courtship, only to find
that admiration turn to contempt, the husband of the woman of great price
declared, "Charm is deceitful" (Prov.
31:30). Those sweet feminine words that seduce a man during courtship
often trap the unlucky husband in a loveless marriage. Earlier in the passage
the husband of the woman of great price praised her, for his heart truly
trusted in her throughout the many years of their marriage. The woman of
great price was not like the wives of most men.
Consequently, after marriage
most wives must learn once again to feel the excitement and devotion of
their courtship days. Thus, God tells young women to learn how to
restore that same innocent kind of love and how to keep it alive in their
hearts. By a wife learning how to look at her husband in a very positive
way and continuing to view him as the greatest husband for her brings out
his best side. It also gives a husband a desire to succeed fully and to
successfully provide for and protect his family. The woman's tender
love balances the man's aggressive nature and channels it toward productivity.
This type of love also brings the wife great personal happiness and fulfillment
as it answers her deep emotional needs.
God didn't accidentally leave
out part of the woman's metabolism or lean muscles when He created Eve.
God made a woman exactly as He wanted her to bea wonderful giver
of physical and emotional comfort to her family. A woman's emotional and
sensitive nature becomes a marvelous trait when she uses it to love others.
Some male authors suggest enviously that women seem to possess a greater
ability for giving and enjoying love than men. When women accept their
weaknesses and their femininity, they become all that God wants them to
be.
Sadly, many a woman moans,
"I would give anything if my husband would just come up to me when I'm
washing dishes and put his arms around me and hug me, just some little
something like that." Due to Victorian morals, many a modern woman still
views men as active givers of love while women passively receive their
attention. Such a woman enters marriage expecting to just sit back and
soak up all her husband's love. However, the Bible teaches exactly the
opposite! The Bible portrays the woman as the giver of love and as the
one to initiate affection. If anyone sits back and soaks up love, it
should be the husband.
An executive, who teaches
salesmen how to succeed, said, "The more manly a man is, the more restrained
he is at displaying affection publicly. But such husbands yearn for their
wives to openly express affection. A wife pays her husband a high compliment
by publicly patting him on the knee, rubbing his back, or even kissing
him."
One wife said when she and
her husband visited another couple, she patted her husband on the knee.
She was shocked when the other woman's husband immediately spoke up and
said, "I wish my wife would do that! I wish my wife would pat me on the
knee! But she never does."
The differences between their
roles make it necessary for the man and woman to pay particular attention
to different forms of love. For instance, many a man enjoys expressing
physical love for his wife, but physical attraction alone doesn't help
him lead with wisdom and justice. So God focuses on the husband's weaknesses
and commands him to develop the type of love (agape) which prevents
him from misusing his authority. Agape balances the man's leadership
over his wife by eliminating selfishness. Thus, agape requires a
husband to make an intelligent estimate of his wife's needs and to act
in her best interest instead of his own desires.
Just as God shows His love
for women by commanding husbands to intellectually love their wives as
their own bodies, God shows the same compassion for men by commanding wives
to learn how to openly love their husbands. Many women naturally enjoy
expressing tenderness to their husbands, but many more fall into the trap
of wanting to receive affection before they willingly give physical love.
Basically, affectionate
love that pleases God comes from a deliberate commitment to satisfy the
emotional needs of the object loved rather than a selfish desire to soak
up all the tenderness possible. Many love-starved women suffer simply
because they focus on receiving love rather than giving love. Women who
complain that their husbands don't greet them affectionately often don't
display any joy at their husbands' homecoming.
Many years ago I witnessed
a conversation between my grandmother, Ethel McBride Collinsworth, who
at that time had been married for over fifty years, and her older sister.
My great aunt had been widowed once and then married a widower. She was
then widowed again and was now married to her third husband. She had grown
up with her third husband and had known him all her life, but he had never
married until he married her when they were both in their seventies. My
great aunt lamented to my grandmother, "You know when I was married to
my second husband, a day never went by that he didn't tell me that he loved
me. But it is not that way now," and she started to cry.
Without hesitating, my grandmother
replied, "You have to remember that your second husband had had a wife
before you to teach him how to love. Your husband now has never had a wife
to teach him how to live with a woman."
I have told this story many
times to women, young and old, who have, likewise, cried that their husbands
didn't show enough affection. My grandmother's wisdom about the wife's
role in love certainly blessed her life. She and my grandfather celebrated
seventy wedding anniversaries before she died of the complications of multiple
strokes. However, during those long years of paralysis and helplessness,
her love for her husband and her family still came out in her embraces
and halting words. Some of my most cherished memories are of the love my
grandfather returned to her during those years. No matter how many times
she asked the same question over and over, he always answered her each
time as if it were the first time she asked. He would sit and hold her
hand for hours. And when he thought no one was listening, he was overheard
telling her what a great wife and mother she'd been.
One of the greatest lessons
women need to learn is to place the emphasis on giving love instead of
receiving love. God's command to learn how to love one's husband gives
a lifetime of rewards. But a woman's tender emotional nature often causes
her to turn her feelings inward to feel sorry for herself instead of outward
to love her husband. Thus, God's command strikes at the wife's greatest
danger for misusing love.
Ocie Lue C. Snodgrass, my
mother, wrote a poem that highlights the rewards of freely bestowed love:
Marriage Account
MARRIAGE . . .
Is like a savings account;
We must put something in
Before we can take something out.
The amount we deposit
Day by day
Is doing kind deeds
And kneeling to pray.
Love and sweet words
Will make our account grow:
With loads of hugs and kisses
We are millionaires
Next thing we know.
It almost seems humanly impossible
for wives to fully understand just how much their husbands depend upon
their love, given freely and without thought of reciprocation. A man without
a wife affectionately and obviously loving him still endures deep loneliness,
and he still searches for the answer to his problem.
Loves Her Children
When a woman truly cherishes
her husband, she naturally treasures the fruit of their union, their children.
God wants mothers to express the same kind of emotional tenderness for
their children as they exhibit for their husbandsphileo.
Little children soak up this display of warmth as if they were dry sponges
and thrive on it.
A mother's nurturing nature
helps her create a wholesome environment in the home for her children.
She may not possess the man's muscles or aggressive nature, but her soft
voice and calm spirit provide exactly what her children need. One woman
observed, "My children misbehave the most when I'm tense and nervous."
Another mother said, "My
children show more affection to both my husband and me when I have a calm
day and take the time to visit and play with them. But when I keep a rigid
schedule that doesn't allow for any interruptions, they pout and withhold
their kisses."
A loving mother thinks her
children are the best she could have even if they are homely and failed
the first grade three times. She readily pats, hugs, squeezes, and kisses
her children. She surrounds them with warm love to give them the self-confidence
necessary to mature into stable adults. Her commitment of emotional involvement
with her children continually finds ways of expression regardless of what
the world thinks of them.
After hearing this description
of a mother's love, one woman said, "I really appreciate the example of
a mother loving her child even if he's failed the first grade three times,
because my little boy really has failed three times in school. Not
only that, but he has a bladder problem, and he's always wetting his pants.
It's smelly and bothersome. I've really had a bad problem with my attitude
and resenting him. Now I realize that I need to love him in spite of his
problems because to me, his mother, he should be the most wonderful little
boy I could have."
Irving Wallace's book The
Two, about the original Siamese twins, provides a beautiful study of
this type of love. It tells the true story of a mother in Siam who gave
birth to twin boys joined at the breast. The sight of the boys so horrified
the midwife that she could not finish assisting with the birth or clean
up the twins afterwards. So the mother finished the birth and cleaned up
her two sons without any help. The story describes the mother's extraordinary
devotion to her sons and the way she molded their personality and character.
In spite of their deformity, the Siamese twins grew up with healthy self-images,
simply because of the way their mother loved them, taught them, and took
care of them. (Irving Wallace, The Two [New York: Simon and Schuster,
1978].)
While phileo for one's
children comes naturally to some women, such as the Siamese twins' mother,
many young mothers need help in mastering it. Mothers who feel trapped
and worthless often label the toddler years as the "terrible two's." Other
mothers abandon their children to day care centers to build defenses against
neglect, indifference, and emotional coldness. In the eyes of many, caring
for little children no longer holds any prestige for a woman, but instead
leans toward public scandal.
One mother said that she
couldn't wait until her child was old enough to put in a nursery so she
could get back to more "human" work. What is so inhuman about loving a
child? What is so degrading about teaching a child how to live? Where is
the dishonor in raising a child to be a happy and loving adult? A woman
who works outside the home receives only a paycheck for her labors, but
a woman who works with her children produces beautiful adults and grandchildren
for her efforts.
One husband said, "I used
to think my job of providing for my family was more important than my wife's
job of caring for the home and our children. But one day I realized that
if my wife neglected our children and they grew up mentally deficient,
then all my work to provide for them would be spent in vain. Now I consider
my job as only a necessary means of enabling my wife to do life's most
important jobproperly caring for our children."
God gives the woman very
important work to do. Neither her husband nor her children survive very
well without her devotion to her duties. They need her weaknesses as they
delight and feel secure in her love.
Cares for the Home
"Workers at home" doesn't mean
"stayers at home, but keepers or guardians of the
household." (Marvin R. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament
[Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1887], p. 342.)
Many people falsely equate
being a woman with being a housekeeper. Instead, being a woman equals
being a giver of love and comfort. But part of bestowing love on others
involves taking care of the home and transforming it into a refuge and
place of peace for those the woman loves.
Unfortunately, many times
a woman reverses her jobs and takes care of her husband because he messes
up her house. A man needs a loving wife more than he needs a housekeeper.
Never should the home become more important than the family who lives in
it. A woman is not to ignore her husband and children in order to be a
spotless housekeeper. Neither should she go to the other extreme and embrace
sloppy housekeeping, for this prevents the home from becoming a relaxed
sanctuary.
The way a woman keeps her
home reflects the love she feels for her husband and children. If she indulges
in hobbies, clubs, visiting, watching television, or reading to the neglect
of her home, then she loves herself more than her family. A woman's attention
to her home tells much about her character and how seriously she takes
her responsibilities.
If a woman wants a happy
marriage, she must learn the art of relaxing and enjoying her femininity.
In this way, she puts her whole family at ease when they step through the
front door into her domain. If a woman does everything else right that
God teaches about marriagebecomes a wonderful mother, an efficient
homemaker, a marvelous cook, an exciting lover, and an adoring wifebut
fails to make her home a palace of luxurious emotional comfort and relaxation,
she fails to achieve the success she and her family desire.
A wife who quit her job told
her husband that she felt more relaxed than when she worked outside the
home. Her husband quickly replied, "I feel more relaxed, too." While only
the woman changed, she set the mood for the entire house.
One young bride said, "After
my wedding shower, my grandmother asked, `Now that you've gotten most of
your wedding gifts, what do you need? I want to get something you need.'
Before I could name some of the small appliances I wanted, my husband spoke
up and said, `We need some pictures on the wall, some knickknacks and things
that will make it a home.' So my grandmother bought us some pictures, but
I wanted to choose those things myself."
A lot of times women discount
little womanly touches to their homes such as throw pillows, flowers, and
pictures. Yet men notice these things and miss them when absent. They may
not say anything, but a woman's touch in the home creates an atmosphere
that men like and appreciate.
The Guardian of Love
Certainly, love should be as
much a way of life for a masculine man as for a feminine woman, for God
commands the man to love his wife as his own body and to nourish and cherish
her. Women thrive on this love from their husbands. By protecting a wife
from the need to earn a living, God placed her in a sheltered environment
where she can devote her total energies to preserving love in her family.
Anyone who thinks that giving love isn't a full time job hasn't read the
Bible's job description of a gracious woman.
Secular fields utilize many
specialists such as doctors, nurses, scientists, electricians, mechanics,
farmers, policemen, teachers, nutritionists, computer scientists, accountants,
and on and on goes an endless list of professions. But serving as an administrator
of love is not an unskilled or low-paying vocation. It requires a profound
education, unwavering dedication, and unlimited endurance along with complete
selflessness.
Unfortunately, many women
fail to even understand their divine challenge, let alone become successful
as guardians or protectors of love. Victorian concepts about love deceive
women into thinking that the man is the guardian of love and that they
are merely its recipients. On the contrary, the Bible, over and over again,
portrays the woman as the chief initiator of love within the family.
It's impossible to adequately
study the woman's role without appreciating the importance of the feminine
expression of love. The following verses give a hint of how the woman functions
as the guardian of love:
Song
of Sol. 4:10: "How beautiful is your love, my sister, my bride! How
much better is your love than wine . . . "
A woman's outpouring of love
is one of the most beautiful features about her. The Shepherd spoke of
the value of the Shulammite's love for him, for he prized her love above
all else. He had no need to numb his senses with alcohol because she smoothed
over the rough spots of life and made the happy times just that much more
pleasant. She knew how to listen to his triumphs and how to encourage him
when he felt defeated.
The Shulammite promised the
Shepherd that when they married, she would freely give her love to him
(Song of
Sol. 7:12). Likewise, she openly longed to unite with him in the embrace
of love (Song
of Sol. 2:6; 8:3).
Everything about the Shulammite conveyed her love to the Shepherd: the
way she looked (Song
of Sol. 4:9), the way she talked (Song
of Sol. 4:11), the way she acted (Song
of Sol. 8:2), and the way she thought (Song of Sol. 5:10-16). Being
a woman is synonymous with giving love.
The Shepherd valued the Shulammite's
open, free love, and he begged her to never hide her affection from him:
Song
of Sol. 8:6-7: "Put me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on
your arm. For love is as strong as death, jealousy is as severe as Sheol;
its flashes are flashes of fire, the very flame of the Lord. Many waters
cannot quench love, nor will rivers overflow it; if a man were to give
all the riches of his house for love, it would be utterly despised."
The Shepherd pleaded with the
Shulammite to keep her love for him as obvious as a seal on her arm and
only for him. He didn't want her telling another man she loved him or that
she thought he was great. The Shepherd wanted her to glorify him by freely
giving her love to only him.
Floods of water cannot quench
true love because honest affection comes from a commitment of concern and
emotional bonding. A woman who functions as a helper meet for her husband
continually gives him her love no matter what trials they face. Even when
she is 101-years-old, a woman should be a picture of love to everyone she
comes in contact with.
Statistics prove that married
men, as a group, live longer than bachelors, and happily married men live
longer than men with unhappy marriages. A man needs his strength to labor
day after day, but he needs the weaknesses of his wife to survive the strain.
A man's physical strength protects his wife from physical harm while
a woman's tender loving care protects her husband from mental harm.
While a man desperately needs
his wife's love, he cannot buy love. Tenderness must go forth as a free
gift without thought of reciprocation to benefit the receiver. For this
reason, if a woman refuses to bestow her love freely upon her husband,
he cannot demand that she love him, for her affection will be utterly despised
as duty instead of welcomed as love.
God uses a woman who voluntarily
serves Him as a giver of love as a shining example of His love for mankind:
Isa.
66:13: "As one whom his mother comforts, so I will comfort you; and
you shall be comforted in Jerusalem."
A loving mother who delights
in bearing children and in caring for them provides an earthly example
of God's love and concern for Israel. A woman's tender, loving emotions
make her the perfect guardian of love for her husband and children. Her
family should be loving individuals, but the woman can easily inhibit their
love or bring it to the surface.
God honored the woman by
creating her with the necessary qualities to be the perfect helper for
man and to teach the world about God's love. God even made a woman's arms
to cradle naturally around her babies. When a man stands erect with his
arms hanging down to his side with elbows still and palms facing forward,
his arms are straight. But when a woman stands in the same position, her
arms curve outward from the elbow. This enables a man to throw a ball straighter
and easier than a woman can, but a woman cradles her baby in a nursing
position easier than a man can. (Gray's Anatomy [Philadelphia: W.
B. Saunder's Co., 1973], p. 204.)
Two college students observed
this same phenomenon of the differences in the arms by the way students
carried their books. While wondering how to tell the boys and girls apart,
one of the students said, "And suddenly, I noticed there was one thing,
and that was the way they carried their books." She observed that almost
all female students wrapped one or both of their arms around their books
and either rested the books on their hips or clasped them against their
chests. Just the opposite, male students almost invariably carried their
books in one hand at the side of their bodies. During a year's travel to
many different universities, the student and her husband found the book-carrying
habit held true everywhere.
The two students speculated
that morphological differences (body builds) seemed to cause the two distinct
methods of book carrying. The most important was the fact that "in most
females, the carrying arm was unable to hang vertically but angled downward."
Their study showed that most girls carried their books in "boy fashion"
until grade school, when they switched to typical "female carrying behavior."
("Sex of Student Determined by Way Books Held," [Spokesman-Review,
12/17/76], p. 27.)
Women may not like it, but
the fact remains, unless a woman is unusual or goes in for special surgery,
a woman's arm is not like a man's. The woman's arm demonstrates
God's ingenuity in giving men and women the qualities they need to do their
respective jobs.
Not every woman is a guardian
of love, for some women display scorn for men and children alike. Only
women who dare to live their lives according to God's wisdom portray God's
love for the world through their love for their husbands, children, and
other people. A woman honors herself by letting God's love shine forth
from her life. Such a woman blesses herself and everyone whose life she
touches.
Conclusion
While God's design of the woman
as being primarily family centered is continually ridiculed and male bashing
is a popular sport, this is one of the most exciting times in history to
be a man or a woman. In large part this excitement comes from the feminist
movementfrom their trooping to the laboratories to prove no differences
exist between the sexes. Now, if it is honest, modern science must bow
its knee before a loving Creator who wondrously designed the woman as the
weaker vesselthe guardian of love, and the man as the stronger
vesselthe guardian of authority. Men and women are free to intellectually
value and enjoy their masculinity and femininity as never before. Indeed,
the creation of the male and the female and the wondrous way they work
together and support each other reflects God's genius. What remains is
to see if men and women are intelligent enough to draw the logical conclusions
from science and rise to their full potentials as human beings and servants
of a loving creator.
More Information
This booklet is composed
of excerpts from two chapters in Marriage: A Taste of Heaven, Vol. I: God's
People Appreciate Marriage by Patsy Rae Dawson. It provides a small sample
of the wealth of exciting information found in the Bible about the differences
between men and women and how they balance and support each other to give
happiness to each of them. Vol. II: God's People Make the Best Lovers examines
in detail how the husband's and wife's minds and bodies fit perfectly together
to bless both of their lives and to give them both supreme sexual bliss.
Your marriage will never be the same after you read these stimulating volumes.
Would you like to see more
of Patsy Rae Dawson's publications? Visit the Gospel
Themes Press website to learn more about their books and cassette album.
 |
http://gospelthemes.com
Copyright © 1999 Gospel Themes Press,
2028 South Austin, Suite 906
Amarillo, TX 79109-1960, USA. All rights
reserved. |
|